This idea of improvement comes after seeing only four council members run for council with only 2 clear possibilities of Kage.
On Council Member:
Council members are made to pay 10k ryo for proof of sincerity of the position, however we have known council members to afk, or leave Nin entirity regardless throughout a multitude of terms. So, does this work? The answer is: No.
Four Council members being possible to fill three spots, makes the position not competitive and the chosen Kage a narrower selection.
Suggestion:
1) Lower the amount of money required to participate for council members to 5k or lower.
OR
2) Make RP missions, completable by ranked to gain "politic tokens" to pay to participate for council member.
On Council Member Roles:
Council Members cannot do much unless a Hokage allows them to. This means that Council Members w/o a supporting Hokage has no important permissions or mechanics installed as their duties are primarily discord based. This has lead to the general consensus that Council Members only important role is 1) is choosing the Hokage, and 2) replacing the Hokage if they resign.
A council members role should not be mechanically important for a garunteed 1 day out of a year.
Suggestion:
3) Council Members should be given new higher tiered RP missions that are village based.
4) While Hokage will still be able to enroll title of ANBU Leader, Medical Leader, LMPF Chief, 12g Leader; Council Members should be able to give out and take away a new subset of roles based off of village merit. "Savior of Leaf", "Lord of Fire", "Assassin", "Ninja of Gold" etc.
5) Council Members should be able to gain a weekly amount of ryo, rewarded from the game itself to be used for events. Ryo could be replaced with a more specified currency to reduce chances of abuse (i.e. a new type of tradable event coupon).
On Hokage:
Although anyone can say they are "running for Hokage", the reality of selection is quite narrow. Due to there being only 3 votes in-acted for Hokage, Council members work together to choose a Hokage prior to running for council member to avoid conflicts and get targeted picks.
I feel, as some of you might, the election of Hokage is too focused on Council Members. Council Members should be given more important roles in Leaf to keep the powers balanced in the village, but 3 people should not ultimately decide the Hokage because a vote for them doesn't necessarily mean a vote for the person you wish.
Suggestion:
6) Stop Council Members from electing the Hokage and instead leave it to populous of lv 20+.
OR
7) Stop Council Members from electing Hokage and leave it to ranked votes.
On Rigged Voting:
We have known there is a spam of alts to choose the council members.
Suggestion:
8 ) Place voting boxes on specific days/hours available that a GM can sit in the office and monitor votes.
You may agree or disagree; that is okay!
Choose the numbers you agree with, and the ones you disagree with. (i.e. I agree with 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, but disagree with the rest)
Question
Seifer
This idea of improvement comes after seeing only four council members run for council with only 2 clear possibilities of Kage.
On Council Member:
Council members are made to pay 10k ryo for proof of sincerity of the position, however we have known council members to afk, or leave Nin entirity regardless throughout a multitude of terms. So, does this work? The answer is: No.
Four Council members being possible to fill three spots, makes the position not competitive and the chosen Kage a narrower selection.
Suggestion:
1) Lower the amount of money required to participate for council members to 5k or lower.
OR
2) Make RP missions, completable by ranked to gain "politic tokens" to pay to participate for council member.
On Council Member Roles:
Council Members cannot do much unless a Hokage allows them to. This means that Council Members w/o a supporting Hokage has no important permissions or mechanics installed as their duties are primarily discord based. This has lead to the general consensus that Council Members only important role is 1) is choosing the Hokage, and 2) replacing the Hokage if they resign.
A council members role should not be mechanically important for a garunteed 1 day out of a year.
Suggestion:
3) Council Members should be given new higher tiered RP missions that are village based.
4) While Hokage will still be able to enroll title of ANBU Leader, Medical Leader, LMPF Chief, 12g Leader; Council Members should be able to give out and take away a new subset of roles based off of village merit. "Savior of Leaf", "Lord of Fire", "Assassin", "Ninja of Gold" etc.
5) Council Members should be able to gain a weekly amount of ryo, rewarded from the game itself to be used for events. Ryo could be replaced with a more specified currency to reduce chances of abuse (i.e. a new type of tradable event coupon).
On Hokage:
Although anyone can say they are "running for Hokage", the reality of selection is quite narrow. Due to there being only 3 votes in-acted for Hokage, Council members work together to choose a Hokage prior to running for council member to avoid conflicts and get targeted picks.
I feel, as some of you might, the election of Hokage is too focused on Council Members. Council Members should be given more important roles in Leaf to keep the powers balanced in the village, but 3 people should not ultimately decide the Hokage because a vote for them doesn't necessarily mean a vote for the person you wish.
Suggestion:
6) Stop Council Members from electing the Hokage and instead leave it to populous of lv 20+.
OR
7) Stop Council Members from electing Hokage and leave it to ranked votes.
On Rigged Voting:
We have known there is a spam of alts to choose the council members.
Suggestion:
8 ) Place voting boxes on specific days/hours available that a GM can sit in the office and monitor votes.
You may agree or disagree; that is okay!
Choose the numbers you agree with, and the ones you disagree with. (i.e. I agree with 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, but disagree with the rest)
Feel free to explain why.
Like and Comment!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
5 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now